By entering Justicehawk.com or the links accessible through this site, you expressly agree to be bound by this agreement.
All rights reserved.
Justicehawk.com is not a law firm or referral service and does not provide legal representation to visitors of this site. Justicehawk.com is a consolidated group of lawyers specializing in the representation of those who have been injured by dangerous drugs and medical devices.
Nothing in this website is intended to imply that Justicehawk.com is a referral service which is certified by any state bar or bar association or that Justicehawk.com satisfies the minimum standards for lawyer referral services established by any state bar or bar association. Submissions to this site from individuals seeking an attorney are forwarded only to law firms which have paid consideration other than costs to be included and receive such information. Transmission of such information is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.
Justicehawk.com makes this website and the information contained herein freely available for the sole purpose of providing general information on law related issues for consumers who are seeking a licensed attorney. The information provided on Justicehawk.com is for informational purposes and was not written by medical professionals and should not be viewed as medical or legal advice and should never interfere with a patient and his or her healthcare provider. Justicehawk.com does not guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on this site.
Do not use this site as a substitute for legal advice.
This website is not intended to be advertising and the consolidated group of lawyers who have paid to receive inquiries submitted to this site do not wish to represent anyone based upon viewing this website in a state where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.
The viewing of the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The lawyer who responds will have no obligation to take any action to protect your interests unless he or she agrees to do so in writing.
The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional.
Justicehawk.com does not guarantee a response to your inquires, although in most cases you should be contacted by a lawyer within two business days.
This website is in no way affiliated with any pharmaceutical or medical device company or any trademarked product. This website provides a free matching service for consumers and is not responsible for information or services from third party providers.
You may be entitled to compensation if you or a loved one has been injured by a dangerous drug or medical device. Please be advised that certain states may consider this an attorney advertisement. Every case is different and services available will vary depending on state. Your case may require advice related to your home state and you agree that local counsel may be contacted for referral. The choice of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Results are not guaranteed.
Justicehawk.com does not recommend or endorse any opinions on this site and assumes no liability for material provided by Justicehawk.com or any advice or materials given by a lawyer who you may retain by submitting your information through justicehawk.com. The accuracy of the Justicehawk.com website, information and resources identified are not warranted, guaranteed or intended to substitute / contradict professional legal advice or legal counsel.
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any statement contained herein does not act as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the ultimate outcome of your legal proceeding.
By visiting this site you agree that neither Justicehawk.com nor its suppliers or vendors or linked domain names are responsible or liable for any claim, loss or damage of any kind, directly or indirectly resulting from your use of this site or the information or the resources contained on or accessible through it.
State-Specific Legal Advertising Restrictions and Disclaimers
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(e)
Rule 7.4. Communication of Fields of Practice and Certification.
A lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer does or does not practice in particular fields of law. A lawyer shall not state or imply that the lawyer is a “specialist,” “certified,” or words of similar import except as follows:
(a) a lawyer admitted to engage in patent practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office may use the designation “Patent lawyer” or a substantially similar designation; and
(b) a lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer has been certified as a specialist in a field of law by a named organization or authority, but only if that certification is granted by an organization or authority whose specialty certification program is accredited by the American Bar Association.
(SCO 1123 effective July 15, 1993; amended by SCO 1370 effective April 15, 2000)
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.
Florida Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4-7.2(d) (1997).
A lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer is certified as a specialist in a field of law by a named organization, provide that the communication (i) is not false or misleading within the meaning of Rule 7.1, (ii) clearly states the name of the certifying organization, and (iii) is accompanied by a statement that “The Supreme Court of Hawaii grants Hawaii certification only to lawyers in good standing who have successfully completed a specialty program accredited by the American Bar Association.” (Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct , Rule 7.4(c)Amended effective July 1, 1999.)
The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law and that the certificate, award or recognition is not a requirement to practice law in Illinois.
Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c)(2) (1997).
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This disclosure is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa.
Memberships and offices in legal fraternities and legal societies, technical and professional licenses, and memberships in scientific, technical and professional associations and societies of law or field of practice do not mean that a lawyer is a specialist or expert in a field of law, nor do they mean that such a lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer.
A description or indication of limitation of practice does not mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert in an indicated field of law practice, nor does it mean that such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer.
All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This notice is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa.
See Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-101(A), DR 2-101(C), DR 2-105(A)(3)(c) (1997).
If a Massachusetts lawyer holds himself or herself out as “certified” in a particular service, field or area of law by a non-governmental body, the certifying organization is a private organization, whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
See Massachusetts Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-105(B) (1997).
The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements.
Free Background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney.
The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein.
See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997).
Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor the Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations.
Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (1997).
Neither the state bar of Nevada nor any agency of the State Bar has certified any lawyer identified here as a specialist or as an expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer’s credentials and ability.
Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 198 (1997).
Any certification as a specialist, or any certification in a field of practice, that does not state that such certification has been granted by the Supreme Court of New Jersey or by an organization that has been approved by the American Bar Association, indicates that the certifying organization has not been approved, or has been denied approval, by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the American Bar Association.
See New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(b) (1997).
Any certification by an organization other than the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization does not constitute recognition by the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization, unless the lawyer is also recognized by the board as a specialist in that area of law.
See New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 16-704(D) (1997).
The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law. The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.
Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (1998).
Unless otherwise indicated, Texas lawyers are Not Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in the areas of practice listed on their profiles.
See Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.04(b)(3) (1999).
The Supreme Court of Washington does not recognize certification of specialties in the practice of law. Any certificate, award, or recognition by a group, organization or association used by a Washington attorney to describe his or her qualifications as a lawyer or qualifications in any subspecialty of law is not a requirement to practice law in the State of Washington.
See Washington Rules of Professional Responsibility Rule 7.4(b) (1997).
The Wyoming State Bar does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer’s credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise.
Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law Rule 7.4 (1997).